The many gods objection to pascal's wager
SpletPascal's Wagers. Jeff Jordan - 2002 - Midwest Studies in Philosophy 26 (1):213–223. The Many Gods Objection to Pascal’s Wager. Lawrence Pasternack - 2012 - Philo 15 (2):158-178. Pascal’s Wagers and James’s Will to Believe. Jeff Jordan - 2005 - In William J. Wainwright (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Religion. Splet12. apr. 2024 · The commonest reply to the Wager is known as the “many gods” objection: there are an infinite number of systems of supernatural claims that pose the same dilemma, and nothing to distinguish them in terms of likelihood. ... Pascal’s Wager says that we have most prudential reason to adopt Christianity, seeing as a) the price of being a ...
The many gods objection to pascal's wager
Did you know?
Splet28. jun. 2008 · Jordan's stated objective is to establish the viability of the Jamesian wager, but in some ways his more important philosophical point is that a Jamesian research programme has more promise than continued work on the canonical version. Splet01. sep. 2011 · Sophia. This paper argues that Pascal’s formulation of his famous wager argument licenses an inference about God's nature that ultimately vitiates the claim that wagering for God is in one’s rational self-interest. Specifically, it is argued that if we accept Pascal’s premises, then we can infer that the god for whom Pascal encourages us ...
SpletThe Many Gods Objection (MGO) is widely viewed as a decisive criticism of Pascal’s Wager. Some have attempted to rebut it by employing criteria drawn from the theological … SpletThe Many Gods Objection The wager has been subjected to numerous criticisms. The most common criticism is what is usually referred to as “The Many Gods Objection”. The Many Gods Objection argument goes like this: Suppose one is convinced by Pascal’s wager and want to believe in God, given the existence of numerous religions, one wouldn ...
SpletOn the many-gods objection to Pascal's Wager, see Jordan (2006, 219–23). 5. I do not suggest that this brief argument is a complete summary of Gale's detailed objection to James. 6. This is obvious to consequentialist eyes, and, arguably, plausible (even if not obvious) to any who hold that moral duties are defeasible. 7. See (Somerville 1995 ... Splet28. sep. 2024 · In chapter 9, Paul Saka explores whether or not it is rational to cultivate religious belief by way of the Wager. He distinguishes between the standard “metaphysical wager” about our afterlife fate, and the “mundane wager” which instead argues for the value of religious belief in this life.
SpletPascal's Wager: The Many Gods Objection drcraigvideos 130K subscribers Subscribe 249 Share Save 3.5K views 4 weeks ago Dr. Craig responds to the "many worlds" objection to Pascal's...
SpletAbstract The Many Gods Objection (MGO) is widely viewed as a decisive criticism of Pascal’s Wager. By introducing a plurality of hypotheses with infinite expected utility into … gentle healing music for healthSpletVirgil Martin Nemoianu Perhaps the best known criticism of Pascal's wager is the many Gods objection. As so often with anglophone criticisms of Pascal, the many Gods … gentle healing wellness centerSpletmany-Gods objection. All that matters is that there are sources of infinite reward besides Pascal’s God. These sources could even be inanimate—as it might be, supreme pleasure … chris evans flexingSpletPascal's Wager is a possible bet (but not a very good one): Reply to Harmon Holcomb III. Graham Oppy - 1996 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 40 (2):101 - 116. … gentle healing music of healthSpletThe many gods objection is that Pascal's wager only makes sense for Christianity. a. True b. False. Some people object that Pascal's wager expresses a low view of religious faith. a. True b. False. Pascal thought we could change our … chris evans football bengalsSpletMultiple-Choice The many gods objection points out that Pascal's wager is between a. The existence of the Christian God and no God at... What Zagzebski means by a “live option” … gentle healing spaSpletIt's actually a common modern objection to the Wager --a quick websearch shows Dawkins giving a fairly cogent version of it. The reason Pascal doesn't consider it is that he's … chris evans funny you should ask